Founding Tokyo Senmon Gakko

After leaving government in 1881, Shigenobu Okuma promoted a new private school. Azusa Ono and colleagues prepared its educational organization, while Okuma obtained land, supplied funds and participated in major decisions. Tokyo Senmon Gakko opened on October 21, 1882 with political, legal, English and physical-science studies.

Okuma initially supported the institution without appearing among its principal officers or regularly attending formal functions. The site lay near his residence, and names associated with Waseda and Totsuka circulated alongside its official title. In 1902 it formally adopted the name Waseda University.

References: [1] [2] [3]

Academic expansion and university recognition

Literary study was added in 1890, followed by expansion into education, commerce, science and engineering. A school for Chinese students operated from 1905 to 1910. Libraries, research facilities and different levels of coursework developed with this broader academic organization.

Adoption of a university name in 1902 preceded recognition under the University Act in 1920. The latter arrangement included five undergraduate schools: political science and economics, law, literature, commerce, and science and engineering. Its name, educational activity and legal status therefore have distinct institutional chronologies.

References: [1] [2]

Mission and postwar rebuilding

In 1913 Okuma presented a newly adopted mission drafted by colleagues including Sanae Takata, Shoyo Tsubouchi and Kenkichi Ichijima. It emphasized independent scholarship, application of learning and the cultivation of good citizens. The statement formalized educational aims after decades of activity rather than originating as an unchanged founding document in 1882.

Air raids destroyed several buildings and research facilities in 1945. Reconstruction followed, with four-year curricula under the postwar system established in 1949. New master's and doctoral programs followed in 1951 and 1953. Institutional continuity thus included both rebuilding and changes in the national framework for higher education.

References: [1] [4]