Advance permission for reuse

Publishing a work online does not automatically authorize translation, adaptation or redistribution. A public license supplies repeatable conditions for those activities while copyright can remain with the right holder.

Open Definition 2.1 requires permissions that include commercial reuse and modification. Attribution and share-alike conditions can qualify; noncommercial-only or no-adaptations restrictions do not meet that definition.

References: [1] [2]

Permissions and usable forms

Legal permission to modify is different from receiving a usable representation. Open Definition addresses machine-readable material and open formats; the software-specific Open Source Definition requires source in its preferred form for modification.

A table image and an editable dataset offer different practical possibilities. Likewise, downloading an executable alone does not establish source availability. Permission and delivery format are separate questions.

References: [1] [3]

Identifying the grant

The license, version and identified material define the grant. Text, photographs and software on one site can carry different notices, including exclusions for third-party material.

Licensing also differs from public-domain status. A license grants permissions under rights that exist; it does not recreate copyright over public-domain elements or remove applicable exceptions.

References: [4] [1]