The World Trade Organization: Establishment and Cooperation

The World Trade Organization, abbreviated WTO, was established on 1 January 1995. It carried forward the multilateral trading system developed under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and brought different sets of rules for goods, services and intellectual property into a common institution. Its immediate foundation was the Uruguay Round of negotiations from 1986 to 1994, rather than a separate meeting that began only in 1995.

On 15 April 1994, the parties signed the relevant legal instruments in Marrakesh, Morocco. The ministerial declaration, on behalf of participating governments and the European Communities, confirmed the negotiating results and established a Preparatory Committee to handle matters before entry into force. Participants still needed to complete domestic acceptance procedures. Signature in Marrakesh and the start of the new organization's operations in 1995 therefore marked different stages.

References: [1] [2] [3]

The WTO's creation did not erase all existing rules and staff arrangements. The Marrakesh Agreement provided, as far as possible, for the former GATT Secretariat to become the new organization's Secretariat and for continuity of personnel. Peter Sutherland oversaw the early transition, and Renato Ruggiero succeeded him as Director-General in May 1995. Continuity in treaties and administration allowed the new institution to begin receiving notifications, organizing meetings and handling disputes quickly.

The change was nevertheless more than a new name. Rules on trade in goods, trade in services and trade-related intellectual property gained a single organizational framework, while dispute settlement and trade policy review became shared functions. GATT 1994 was legally distinct from the original agreement of 1947. The transition between old and new arrangements needed specific treatment; the two names should not be treated as referring to identical texts.

References: [1] [3] [5]

Members took part in decision-making through the Ministerial Conference and General Council, with the latter performing the relevant functions between ministerial meetings. Three councils separately oversaw goods, services and intellectual property. The General Council also met in its different capacities as the Dispute Settlement Body and the Trade Policy Review Body. The same member representatives could therefore work through different procedures.

On 31 January 1995, the General Council adopted rules of procedure and established several committees, including the Committee on Trade and Development and the Committee on Budget, Finance and Administration. The Secretariat in Geneva provided legal, statistical, conference and technical support. The duties of the Director-General and staff were international in character. The institutions' establishment dates, rules of procedure and specific responsibilities gave member cooperation regular points of access.

References: [1] [9]

The budget report adopted in December 1994 set revised 1995 expenditure for the relevant contracting parties and members at 105,389,500 Swiss francs. Of this, 104,400,000 Swiss francs was to be raised through contributions, supplemented by estimated miscellaneous income. The report included provisional funding of 1.7 million Swiss francs for the standing Appellate Body, showing that new adjudicative procedures required personnel and administrative resources.

This was a budget for the transition between old and new systems, not a figure that can simply be treated as a later year's standalone organizational operating costs. The arrangements provided for the WTO Secretariat to continue servicing relevant older agreements and retained existing methods of assessing contributions in 1995. Under the founding agreement, the Director-General submits an annual budget, the Committee on Budget, Finance and Administration reviews it and recommends action to the General Council, and the Council approves it.

References: [4] [1]

The Director-General's 1995 report shows that the new organization rapidly moved into implementation. The Committee on Agriculture received notifications on tariff-quota administration and discussed the relationship between preferential trading arrangements and most-favoured-nation quotas. The committees on safeguards, countervailing measures and anti-dumping began reviewing members' domestic legislation. Many notifications remained incomplete, demonstrating the substantial national administrative work still needed after the agreements entered into force.

This cooperation typically involved one country providing information, other members asking questions, and a committee recording and continuing the discussion. It could clarify policies but did not automatically remove conflicts of interest. More than a broad trade conference, these repeated notifications and exchanges illustrate how international rules entered the daily work of national customs, legal and trade administrations.

References: [5]

In January 1995, Venezuela requested consultations over US gasoline standards; Brazil subsequently brought a related complaint. The dispute centred on whether different baselines for imported gasoline and domestically produced US gasoline violated trade obligations. The case went through panel and appellate proceedings, and the relevant reports were adopted by the Dispute Settlement Body on 20 May 1996. Both environmental policy objectives and requirements for non-discriminatory measures were examined through the interpretation of specific rules.

The Dispute Settlement Understanding provides that, once procedural conditions are met, panel reports are normally adopted unless appealed or rejected by consensus. This reduced the scope for a single respondent member to block a report. The gasoline case also shows that cooperation includes handling differences through agreed procedures, rather than requiring countries to accept the same position from the outset. The organization's institutional value depends on rules, resources, information and implementation working together.

References: [6] [7] [8]