The Outer Space Treaty: Conclusion and Implementation

The Outer Space Treaty's formal title is the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies. Negotiations translated earlier UN resolutions on peaceful uses and prohibition of weapons of mass destruction in outer space into legal commitments by states parties.

A US State Department memorandum of 10 August 1966 recorded President Lyndon Johnson's instruction to UN representative Arthur Goldberg to pursue a treaty on the use of celestial bodies, and Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko's expression of interest to Secretary-General U Thant. Both sides subsequently submitted drafts. From 12 July to 4 August that year, the Legal Subcommittee of the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space negotiated in Geneva; the US accepted expansion of the scope from celestial bodies to outer space generally.

Disagreements centred on reciprocal visits to facilities on celestial bodies, mandatory reporting of activities and restrictions on military installations and equipment. Private US–Soviet consultations intertwined with multilateral UN procedures. On 19 December, General Assembly Resolution 2222 endorsed the annexed treaty and requested that the depositary governments open it for signature and ratification as soon as possible.

References: [1] [2] [3]

The treaty opened for signature in London, Moscow and Washington on 27 January 1967. At the Washington ceremony, Secretary of State Dean Rusk and Goldberg signed for the United States, while the British and Soviet ambassadors signed for their respective countries. The other two capitals simultaneously held their own ceremonies. The three countries became depositaries, responsible for keeping and notifying instruments of ratification, accession and related acts.

Signature did not automatically complete domestic ratification. After hearings, the US Senate consented to ratification on 25 April. The United Nations Treaty Series records that the United States, United Kingdom and Soviet Union deposited their instruments on 10 October. Article XIV required instruments from five states, necessarily including all three depositaries; the conditions for entry into force were met on 10 October 1967.

Under Article XIV, countries depositing ratification or accession instruments after entry into force became bound on their own deposit dates. Participation thus expanded progressively, rather than the first signing ceremony representing completed ratification by every state.

References: [1] [3]

Article I provided that exploration and use should serve the interests of all countries regardless of economic or scientific development, with equal freedom of exploration, use and scientific investigation. Article II prohibited national appropriation of outer space and celestial bodies through claims of sovereignty, use, occupation or any other means. Scientific and technical advantage could not therefore become territorial acquisition under the treaty.

Article IV's prohibitions had defined objects and geographic scope: states could not place objects carrying nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in Earth orbit, install such weapons on celestial bodies, or station them elsewhere in outer space. The Moon and other celestial bodies were to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes, without military bases, weapons testing or military manoeuvres.

The same article permitted military personnel to conduct scientific research or other peaceful activities and allowed equipment needed for peaceful exploration. The treaty therefore cannot be summarized as prohibiting all military personnel and equipment in outer space, nor did this article prohibit every conventional military use of Earth orbit.

References: [1]

Article VI required states parties to bear international responsibility for national activities in outer space, whether carried out by governmental agencies or non-governmental entities. The latter required authorization and continuing supervision by the appropriate state. Corporate activities thus fell within state implementation responsibilities and did not escape treaty constraints simply because the operator was not a government agency.

Article VII separately imposed international liability for relevant damage caused by space objects and their components on states that launched, procured launch, or provided launch territory or facilities. Article VIII preserved the registering state's jurisdiction and control over an object and its personnel and specified that entry into outer space did not change ownership. Prohibiting state appropriation of celestial bodies and allowing ownership of spacecraft themselves were separate matters.

Article IX required avoidance of harmful contamination and adverse changes to Earth's environment from introducing extraterrestrial matter. States proposing activities that might harmfully interfere with another country's peaceful exploration had to undertake appropriate international consultations beforehand; other concerned states could also request consultations.

References: [1]

Article V made assistance to astronauts in distress an interstate obligation: states were to provide all possible help in accidents, distress or emergency landings and return astronauts safely and promptly to the spacecraft's state of registry. They also had to give timely notice of phenomena threatening astronauts' life or health. Alongside national competition, the treaty preserved concrete cooperation for personal safety.

Article XI required reporting, to the extent feasible, to the UN Secretary-General, the public and the international scientific community on the nature, conduct, locations and results of activities. Article XII placed visits to facilities and spacecraft on celestial bodies on a reciprocal basis, with reasonable advance notice to arrange safety precautions and avoid interference with normal operations.

These final formulations addressed disputes during the 1966 negotiations over openness and access, but did not create an international agency empowered to inspect every space activity compulsorily at any time. Operation of the rules still depended on notification, consultation and cooperation by states parties.

References: [1] [3]

The United Kingdom's Outer Space Act 1986 provides a concrete example of later implementation. It empowered the responsible minister to safeguard fulfilment of British international obligations concerning space activities through licensing and other means. As originally enacted, it generally required licences for launching, procuring launch and operating space objects within its scope, while providing exceptions.

The act required licensed activities to comply with the United Kingdom's international obligations and not endanger public health, the safety of people or property, or national security. Licences could include conditions for equipment inspection, orbital-data reporting, avoidance of pollution and harmful interference, and third-party liability insurance. Under statutory conditions, the minister could also suspend or revoke licences or direct that activities cease.

Such domestic legislation translated the treaty's principles of authorization, supervision and responsibility into practical administrative powers. It was a later stage of institutional implementation, not proof that every country had established equivalent arrangements in 1967. Nor could the treaty text substitute for a specific assessment of whether a particular activity complied.

References: [4]