Apollo 12: Precision Landing, Lunar Experiments and the 1969 Return

Apollo 12 was NASA's second crewed lunar-landing mission. Whereas Apollo 11 primarily demonstrated that people could land on the Moon and return safely, Apollo 12 further combined precision landing, systematic sampling and long-term surface observations. Its target was near the uncrewed Surveyor 3 spacecraft in Oceanus Procellarum. Landing in the preselected area would allow astronauts to investigate geology as planned and retrieve manufactured materials exposed on the Moon for more than two years.

The crew comprised Commander Charles Conrad, Command Module Pilot Richard Gordon and Lunar Module Pilot Alan Bean. Conrad and Bean performed the surface work, while Gordon remained in lunar orbit carrying out command-and-service-module tasks. Scientific analysis also relied on ground teams: Gary Latham and colleagues at the Lamont–Doherty Geological Observatory studied seismic records, while Conway Snyder, Douglas Clay and Marcia Neugebauer at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory conducted solar-wind spectrometer research.

References: [1] [2]

The mission retained the system of Saturn V launcher, command and service modules, and lunar module. The 1970 mission report stated that the rocket had no major changes from Apollo 11, while the spacecraft received targeted improvements. Some command-and-service-module wiring was rearranged to avoid a single-point failure in the abort system, and the water supply and gas-separation equipment were improved. The lunar module reduced some structural weight while strengthening the corresponding load-bearing components.

A longer lunar stay also changed crew provisions. Two hammocks were added to the lunar module, and the portable life-support replenishment system and equipment carriers were improved. A color television camera replaced the earlier slow-scan black-and-white camera. The full Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package replaced Apollo 11's early experiment package; after delivery, astronauts had to carry and deploy its instruments and connect them to the central station and power source.

References: [1]

The spacecraft launched from Kennedy Space Center, Florida, at 16:22 on 14 November 1969. All specific times here are Greenwich Mean Time. About 36.5 and 52 seconds after liftoff, the vehicle was involved in two lightning discharges. The mission report described the first as a cloud-to-ground discharge through the vehicle and the second as an intercloud discharge, showing that the launch environment and vehicle together created the risk.

The first discharge disconnected the fuel cells from the spacecraft's power buses and caused the loss of nine measurement channels. The second caused the inertial platform to lose its reference; both briefly affected communications. After reaching Earth orbit, the crew and ground team carried out special system checks before continuing toward the Moon. Avoiding an abort did not mean the lightning caused no damage, and the subsequent checks cannot be omitted from the account of the mission's success.

References: [1] [2]

The spacecraft began lunar-orbit insertion at 03:47 on 18 November, and the lunar module landed in Oceanus Procellarum at 06:54 on 19 November. According to the mission report's measurements, the landing point was about 535 feet, or 163 meters, from Surveyor 3. Descent was largely controlled by automatic guidance, with manual corrections in the final stage. This capability allowed an exploration route to be planned around a predetermined objective rather than wholly reconsidered after landing.

Conrad and Bean completed two surface EVAs totaling about seven hours and 46 minutes. The first deployed experiments and collected samples; the second followed a geological traverse, examining craters, photographing sampling locations and visiting Surveyor 3. The color camera stopped working after being inadvertently pointed toward the Sun, preventing lunar television coverage from continuing as planned, but photography, sampling and other scientific work proceeded.

References: [1] [2]

The crew returned about 34 kilograms of lunar material, including rocks, surface soil and core-tube samples. They also removed Surveyor 3's camera, soil scoop and sections of tubing for study of the lunar environment's long-term effects on manufactured materials. The preliminary science report found that crystalline rocks predominated, with variations in the textures and mineral compositions of basaltic igneous rocks. Comparison with Apollo 11 samples allowed study of similarities and differences between mare sites.

Equipment left on the surface included a passive seismometer, magnetometer, solar-wind spectrometer, suprathermal-ion detector and associated cold-cathode gauge. The magnetometer measured a stable field of about 36 gammas near the landing site. After the lunar module's ascent stage was deliberately crashed into the Moon, the seismometer recorded a signal lasting about an hour. Instruments extended observations of the lunar environment beyond the crewed stay, but the 1970 report explicitly described its findings as preliminary; not every interpretation made then should be treated as final.

References: [1] [2]

At 14:25 on 20 November, the lunar module's ascent stage left the surface and subsequently rendezvoused and docked with the command and service modules in orbit. After transfer of crew and samples, the ascent stage was jettisoned and deliberately impacted the Moon. The Earth-return maneuver began at 12:49 on 21 November, and the command module splashed down in the Pacific at 20:58 on 24 November, ending a flight of about 244 hours and 36 minutes. Under contemporary contamination-control procedures, the returning crew, samples and spacecraft were transferred to the Lunar Receiving Laboratory.

The mission achieved more than a second visit to the surface. Precision landing made a geological traverse and recovery of an older spacecraft's components executable plans, while Gordon's orbital photography supplied images for later site selection and training. The mission report and preliminary science report separately organized system performance, anomalies and observations, turning a flight of about ten days into data that could continue to be tested, compared and reinterpreted.

References: [1] [2]