The Second Battle of Kharkov: Offensive, Counterattack and Encirclement

The Second Battle of Kharkov in May 1942 saw a Soviet offensive turn into encirclement and destruction. Southwestern Direction commander Timoshenko also commanded the Southwestern Front; Military Council member Khrushchev handled political work, and Bagramyan was chief of staff. Bock commanded German Army Group South, Paulus's Sixth Army defended the Kharkov sector, and Kleist's group prepared a counterattack from the south.

The battlefield lay in northeastern Ukraine, with cities and towns linked by railways, roads and dirt tracks and crossed by the Seversky Donets. Soviet forces held the Stary Saltov and Barvenkovo bridgeheads, while Germans controlled the Chuguyev area. Bridgeheads supplied starting points, but spring-flooded streams and wetlands made bridging and supplies prerequisites for advance.

References: [1] [2]

Timoshenko initially proposed a wide-ranging spring and summer offensive, requesting dozens of additional infantry divisions and substantial equipment. With limited reserves, Stalin and the high command narrowed the objective to Kharkov. The April plan sent the Twenty-Eighth Army from the northeast and the Sixth Army and Bobkin group north and northwest from the Izyum salient, seeking to encircle the German Sixth Army.

The Germans had also planned to eliminate the salient to shorten their line and clear an obstacle before summer operations. Operation Fridericus underwent repeated revisions to its pincer routes, while strained rail transport delayed reinforcements. The Soviet attack and German counterattack emerged from the overlap of two independently developed plans.

References: [1]

Early on May 12, Soviet forces attacked along three main axes. In the south they broke through German VIII Corps defenses, while tanks approached Kharkov from the northeast. Bock transferred armored and infantry divisions originally intended for the counterattack to reinforce Paulus. The Luftwaffe meanwhile shifted some units north from Crimea to strengthen ground support.

The Soviets opened initial gaps but failed to commit follow-on mobile forces promptly. Soviet histories and participants variously cited false intelligence, troop organization and command hesitation for the delay. By the time XXI and XXIII Tank Corps entered on May 17, the offensive's first phase had weakened and the German counterattack on the southern flank began the same day.

References: [1]

With strong air support, Kleist's forces broke through the Soviet Ninth Army and advanced toward Barvenkovo and Izyum. Southern Front commander Malinovsky temporarily lost contact with Ninth Army headquarters and reinforcements on the move, and the salient's southern defenses rapidly collapsed.

Between May 17 and 19, the decisive question was whether to stop the Kharkov offensive immediately. Vasilevsky, Khrushchev and Bagramyan later gave differing accounts of who first proposed withdrawal or redirection and what reports Stalin received. What is clear is that Soviet forces failed promptly to redirect the offensive toward their threatened rear. Only on the evening of May 19 did the Sixth Army and Bobkin group receive orders to halt and redeploy southeast.

References: [1]

The German 14th Panzer Division successively seized Petrovskoye and Protopopovka, cutting river crossings and narrowing the salient's exit. On May 22, it contacted Sixth Army at Balakleya; other armored forces linked up the next morning, widening the blocking belt. The Soviet Sixth and Fifty-Seventh Armies, Bobkin group and remnants of the Ninth Army were compressed into the pocket.

Breakouts on May 25 and 26 failed to open a lasting corridor, and fighting largely ended on May 28. The Germans later reported about 240,000 prisoners, a victor's claim rather than an individually verified casualty total. Kharkov remained outside Soviet control, the salient and its west-bank offensive bases were lost, many troops became prisoners, and formations and equipment in the southwestern direction suffered severe damage.

References: [1]

The defeat improved Germany's position in the south. Responsibility for the delay also became part of Soviet politics and war memory: Khrushchev used it to criticize Stalin at the Twentieth Party Congress in 1956, while later accounts shifted blame toward Khrushchev and other front-line leaders.

A Soviet General Staff study written in 1951 and declassified in 1964 examined reconnaissance, coordination between fronts and operational command. It showed overlapping command and staff responsibilities in the Southwestern Direction and Southwestern Front. The study still used Stalin's teachings as its evaluative framework, reflecting how military reviews were expressed within the political system of the period.

References: [1] [2]