Henry IV, Part 2: Succession, Tavern Companions and Early Printed Texts

Henry IV, Part 2 follows the crisis left by the previous play through the old king’s death and Henry V’s coronation. Giorgio Melchiori’s Cambridge introduction places composition in late 1597 or early 1598. The title page of the 1600 edition states that the Lord Chamberlain’s Men had already performed it publicly many times.

Shakespeare drew on historical accounts including Holinshed’s Chronicles, weaving the royal story together with fictional comic characters. Political negotiation, family conflict and everyday life share the play. The first edition’s subtitle emphasized Falstaff’s humour and Pistol’s swagger, showing how publishers used these characters to attract readers.

References: [1] [3]

The opening speaker is Rumour, covered in painted tongues. It tells the audience how it reverses the outcome of Shrewsbury, spreading reports of the prince’s defeat and Hotspur’s victory. The Earl of Northumberland then hears conflicting accounts before confronting his son’s death. The audience understands the manufacture of false news before watching characters act upon it.

The later rebellion ends through negotiation and deception. John of Lancaster promises to address the rebels’ grievances, then arrests their leaders after they dismiss their forces. He argues that his promise concerned remedying abuses and included no pardon. The restoration of political order thus carries the shadows of deception and calculated wording.

References: [1] [2]

Falstaff goes to the country to select soldiers. Justices Shallow and Silence reminisce about their youthful adventures while handling recruitment. Two stronger candidates pay Bardolph and are allowed home, leaving weaker men to serve. Falstaff presents this choice as valuing spirit over physique, using eloquence to obscure the exchange of money.

The scene makes war a matter of who must leave home and who can pay to escape. Shallow boasts about the past; Falstaff privately exposes his exaggerations while planning to profit from this landed acquaintance. Ageing, memory and money run through their jokes, echoing illness and succession anxiety at court.

References: [2]

In Act 3, Henry IV envies the sleep of poor people and a boy aboard a ship. State affairs keep him awake despite his comfortable chamber. Later, Hal thinks his father has stopped breathing and died, and takes the crown. The king wakes and interprets the act as his son’s impatience to seize power. The object signifies succession while also causing misunderstanding between father and son.

Hal explains and asks forgiveness. The old king then discusses his difficult path to the throne and advises directing restless energies abroad. Reconciliation leaves the political inheritance in place: his son receives a title together with questions of managing nobles, maintaining rule and diverting internal conflict.

References: [2]

After succeeding, Hal affirms the Chief Justice’s earlier punishment of him under the law and retains him in judicial authority. Falstaff expects old friendship to bring office and privilege. The expectations collide after the coronation: the new king publicly rejects familiarity and forbids his former companions to approach him, while promising support and linking possible future employment to reform.

Falstaff tells Shallow that the rejection is merely a public performance and imagines a private summons later. The epilogue turns back to the audience, promising more about Catherine of France and Sir John and explicitly distinguishing Falstaff from the martyr Oldcastle. The dramatic relationship has broken, while the performer’s address reopens questions of continuation and the character’s fate.

References: [1] [2]

On 23 August 1600, Andrew Wise and William Aspley registered Much Ado About Nothing and Henry IV, Part 2 with London’s Stationers’ Company. The entry names both books and Shakespeare. Valentine Simmes printed the quarto that year; the title page retains his initials, V. S. Booksellers, printer and performing company appear at different points in the work’s circulation.

The quarto turned dialogue unfolding on stage into a portable book that readers could browse. Its title page records earlier performances, while registration marks the booksellers’ publication procedure. Part 2 did not receive the repeated reprints of Part 1 before its inclusion in the First Folio of 1623.

References: [1] [3] [4]

The 1600 quarto survives in two states. One lacks the king’s sleepless scene; the other adds it, gaining two leaves and resetting adjoining material. The 1623 First Folio preserves passages absent from the quarto while omitting some quarto wording. These differences make the complete play encountered by modern readers a text assembled through editorial choices.

Mowat and Werstine’s introduction notes the lack of agreement about manuscript origins, performance cuts and censorship. Their edition uses the quarto as its base, incorporates important Folio variants and marks sources with symbols. Following the play through its editions reveals both a continuing story and changes left by each printing and editorial treatment.

References: [5]